Re: [GOLD] advice on powerpc64 .opd handling

[Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>]

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:08:13PM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> Normally a C array should be std::vector in C++.  This should probably be
>>
>>   std::vector<unsigned int> ent_shndx_;
>>   std::vector<typename elfcpp::Elf_Types<size>::Elf_Off> opd_ent_off_;
>
> Even when no resizing will be needed?

Yes.  The overhead is small.

>> Will this work correctly if the symbol is defined in a SHT_GROUP
>> section that is discarded?
>
> Hasn't something gone horribly if we're trying to call such a
> function?

Seems to me that it's normal for a C++ template instantiation.  Maybe
I'm missing something.

Ian