This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Release 2.23 ?


On Oct 24, 2012, at 11:35 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:

> On 24.10.2012 11:32, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>> 
>> On Oct 24, 2012, at 11:21 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> 
>>> On 22.10.2012 16:20, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On Oct 22, 2012, at 6:44 AM, Kenny Simpson wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>>> No news for about 2 weeks.  Is the release still
>>>>>> 'soon'?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Yes.
>>>>>> I hope to make the release next week.
>>>>> 
>>>>> This week?  Any blocking bugs/late fixes/etc.. ?
>>>> 
>>>> Now released.  I will announce it tomorrow.
>>> 
>>> there seem to be more oddities with this release, maybe somebody could double-check.
>>> 
>>> - bfd/doc has a lot of not-removed .texi files, which are not
>>>  found on the branch.
>> 
>> Yes, that was part of the missing commit.
> 
> then maybe bfd/doc/Makefile.am needs an update?

Why ?  They are generated during the build, and therefore not in the CVS repository.
They should be present only in the release branch.

>>>    2.23/bfd/doc/aoutx.texi
>>>    2.23/bfd/doc/archive.texi
>>>    2.23/bfd/doc/archures.texi
>>>    2.23/bfd/doc/bfd.info
>>>    2.23/bfd/doc/bfdio.texi
>>>    2.23/bfd/doc/bfdt.texi
>>>    2.23/bfd/doc/bfdver.texi
>>>    2.23/bfd/doc/bfdwin.texi
>>>    2.23/bfd/doc/cache.texi
>>>    2.23/bfd/doc/coffcode.texi
>>>    2.23/bfd/doc/core.texi
>>>    2.23/bfd/doc/elf.texi
>>>    2.23/bfd/doc/format.texi
>>>    2.23/bfd/doc/hash.texi
>>>    2.23/bfd/doc/init.texi
>>>    2.23/bfd/doc/libbfd.texi
>>>    2.23/bfd/doc/linker.texi
>>>    2.23/bfd/doc/mmo.texi
>>>    2.23/bfd/doc/opncls.texi
>>>    2.23/bfd/doc/reloc.texi
>>>    2.23/bfd/doc/section.texi
>>>    2.23/bfd/doc/syms.texi
>>>    2.23/bfd/doc/targets.texi
>>> 
>>> - the aarch64 ld testsuite is not included, the directory
>>>  ld/testsuite/ld-aarch64 is missing.
>> 
>> As far as I know (but I might be wrong here), the aarch64 testsuite was not in the patchset I
>> backported to the release.  Aarch64 people in CC:
> 
> the directory is checked in (checked svn and git repositories).

Argh, you're right.  I will definitely make a 2.23.1 release.

Tristan.



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]