This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Jia Liu <proljc@gmail.com> writes:>>Hi all,
I'm working on several MIPS64-based processors, RTEMS is a part of my SDK. When I build a mips64el toolchain for RTEMS, I found that mips*el support has beed removed, so, I try to take it back.
This patch is tested, and the RTEMS patch will summitted by a friend at ICT.
This looks good in principle. It was Ralf (cc:ed) who removed the port originally,
Well, I don't have any problem in a mips64el target being added to RTEMS and its toolchains, but so far, this does not apply.so once he's happy that the port has indeed been resurrected from an RTEMS POV,
I'll go ahead and apply it.I am uncertain on how to proceed. Without the missing other components (RTEMS, newlib, gcc (+ gdb)) also being submitted, adding a mips64el to binutils doesn't make much sense.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |