This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Tuesday 08 January 2013 04:31:53 Alan Modra wrote: > On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 02:30:00AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > With the --enable-new-dtags flag, you can generate DT_RUNPATH in > > addition to DT_RPATH. But the former tag isn't terribly useful > > so long as the latter is still being generated. > > Huh? I thought that if DT_RUNPATH is present, DT_RPATH is ignored. it is ignored. i meant to point out generating both is pointless and has been for quite a long time now. > Also, if you're going to name the new option --enable-new-dtags-only, > I'd be inclined to make it actually enable the new dtags. ie. don't > require --enable-new-dtags as well. i'm fine with that behavior. i was trying to be conservative. -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |