This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Friday 11 January 2013 04:21:58 John Marino wrote: > On 1/11/2013 07:05, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > With the --enable-new-dtags flag, you can generate DT_RUNPATH in > > addition to DT_RPATH. But the former tag isn't terribly useful > > so long as the latter is still being generated. So add a new > > option to suppress that. > > > > The proposed option name isn't great, but it's in line with the > > existing --neable-new-dtags flag. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger<vapier@gentoo.org> > > > > [Being lazy on CL writing until we hammer out the proposal] > > --- > > I don't think the premise is true. > If both DT_RUNPATH and DT_RPATH dtags are present, DT_RPATH dtag is > ignored by the dynamic linker. yes, as mentioned in the first patchset, that's not what i meant. i just forgot to update the message. -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |