This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Tuesday 15 January 2013 14:06:00 Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote: > > On Tuesday 15 January 2013 09:47:08 Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > >> I'm not aware of any --new-dtags-only option in gold. > > > > [patch 1/2] adds the option > > > >> The patch changing the default for --new-dtags to true is OK. > > > > k k ... i'll wait for the first patch to merge > > I don't know that that patch is going to be approved. I also don't > know that it makes sense to have it default to true. That said with > regard to --new-dtags-only I'm willing to have gold do whatever GNU ld > does. > > For --new-dtags I'm willing to have the default be true even if the > default for GNU ld is false. patch 1/2 doesn't change any defaults ... just adds a new flag patch 2/2 makes gold default to true because gold is so new and is easy to do i'd like to do something with ld.bfd to default new-dtags-only to true for linux systems, but that's a bit harder to pull off in the current ld.bfd framework. so i posted the current code as is since they're usable already. in Gentoo, i plan on changing the ld.bfd default -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |