This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH V2] ARM: plt_size functions need to read instructions in right byte order


On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 06:01:12PM -0700, Victor Kamensky wrote:
> On 22 October 2014 15:50, Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 10:25:13PM -0700, Victor Kamensky wrote:
> >> +  if ((elf_elfheader (abfd)->e_flags) & EF_ARM_BE8)
> >                                        ^ this parenthesis is in the
> > wrong place.  gcc will warn about "if (x & y)", breaking -Werror
> > builds.  Writing "if ((x & y))" silences the gcc warning, so you
> > should write
> >
> >   if ((elf_elfheader (abfd)->e_flags & EF_ARM_BE8))
> >
> > or as I suggested in the previous email (without explaining why)
> >
> >   if ((elf_elfheader (abfd)->e_flags & EF_ARM_BE8) != 0)
> 
> Thanks, Alan.
> 
> Sorry, did not catch that in your previous email I will fix that
> and repost patch shortly.
> 
> > The patch is OK to commit with that change.
> 
> Besides reposting updated patch is there any other actions
> on my side? I am bit a new to this. My assumption is that once
> patch is reviewed and approved, some of maintainers will pick it
> and commit. Is it not correct?

Ah, I thought you had git commit privilege.  Don't worry about
reposting the patch.  I'll commit a fixed version for you.

-- 
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]