This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 24 Mar 2015 10:16, Alan Modra wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 05:57:20AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote: > > We should coordinate this with GCC. > > I agree. Using the same version of autotools for binutils+gdb+gcc is > a good idea. > > Why are we talking about such a small upgrade though? Wouldn't it > make more sense to move to the latest released autotools? Not for new > features, but for the bug fixes that have accumulated over the years. > I know there have been bug reports about the versions we use.. > eg. https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16948 i don't have the cycles to shave that yak. in this case, the minor update (1) is fairly safe and (2) includes a good number of distros. -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |