This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [PATCH] fix in-tree-binutils builds
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- To: Mike Stump <mrs at mrs dot kithrup dot com>
- Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich at suse dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 07:43:05 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix in-tree-binutils builds
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <55A62FD90200007800091184 at mail dot emea dot novell dot com> <CAMe9rOo6G-73GXdaK5_EU_YXmfVUhdt5iSO8eCr=1qgFPLV6Bg at mail dot gmail dot com> <27496A41-4C23-49C5-93B7-9387FDB8BF8C at mrs dot kithrup dot com>
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Mike Stump <mrs@mrs.kithrup.com> wrote:
> On Jul 15, 2015, at 9:07 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 1:03 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> - $gcc_cv_as_gas_srcdir/configure.in \
>>> + $gcc_cv_as_gas_srcdir/configure.[ai][cn] \
>>> $gcc_cv_as_gas_srcdir/Makefile.in ; do
>>> gcc_cv_gas_version=`sed -n -e 's/^[[ ]]*VERSION=[[^0-9A-Za-z_]]*\([[0-9]]*\.[[0-9]]*.*\)/VERSION=\1/p' < $f`
>>
>> How portable is [ai][cn]?
>
> Should be portable enough.
Are there any objections to this patch?
--
H.J.