This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

AArch64 testsuite failures


Hi Jiong,

  I am seeing some new failures in the LD tests for AArch64:

Checking Binutils in: aarch64-elf ... LD: 5 done
  LD REGRESSION: ld-aarch64/emit-relocs-86
  LD REGRESSION: ld-aarch64/emit-relocs-86-overflow
  LD REGRESSION: aarch64-farcall-b-plt
  LD REGRESSION: aarch64-farcall-bl-plt
  LD REGRESSION: ld-aarch64/emit-relocs-86
  LD REGRESSION: ld-aarch64/emit-relocs-86-overflow
  LD REGRESSION: aarch64-farcall-b-plt
  LD REGRESSION: aarch64-farcall-bl-plt

Checking Binutils in: aarch64_be-elf ... LD: 4 done
  LD REGRESSION: ld-aarch64/emit-relocs-86
  LD REGRESSION: ld-aarch64/emit-relocs-86-overflow
  LD REGRESSION: aarch64-farcall-b-plt
  LD REGRESSION: aarch64-farcall-bl-plt
  LD REGRESSION: ld-aarch64/emit-relocs-86
  LD REGRESSION: ld-aarch64/emit-relocs-86-overflow
  LD REGRESSION: aarch64-farcall-b-plt
  LD REGRESSION: aarch64-farcall-bl-plt

This is testing with and without -mabi=ilp32 specified, which is why each failure is appearing twice for each target.

The failures appear to be because the tests are assuming a linux target. Eg:

  ./ld-new: unrecognised emulation mode: aarch64linux32
Supported emulations: aarch64elf aarch64elf32 aarch64elf32b aarch64elfb armelf armelfb
  FAIL: ld-aarch64/emit-relocs-28

Or:

  regexp "^.*:	f941f611 	ldr	x17, \[x16,#1000\]$"
  line   " 2e0:	f9421a11 	ldr	x17, [x16,#1072]"
  [...]
  FAIL: aarch64-farcall-b-plt

Please could you update these tests to fix this problem ?

Cheers
  Nick


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]