This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: 2.25 Backport Request of two testsuite related patches


> On 26 Feb 2016, at 17:40, Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@foss.arm.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Tristan,
> 
>  Is it still OK to backport two ld testsuite patches to *2.25* branch?

Thatâs ok for me.  I would say I donât really care about superseeded
branches.

Tristan.

> 
>  Without this two fixes, there will be some noisy when doing testing
>  with 2.25 binutils.
> 
>  I verified these two patches apply cleanly on 2.25 branch. And as they
>  are pure testsuite changes, there is no functional change on toolchain
>  behavior.
> 
>  Thanks.
> 
> commit 62cf91a31e4086abbee7bae5cb1b6d9f5133aaad
> Author: Will Newton <will.newton@linaro.org>
> Date:   Thu Oct 23 18:20:27 2014 +0100
> 
>    ld/testsuite/ld-unique: Fix running unique tests on ARM
> 
>    The @ character is a comment character on ARM, so use % instead. Also
>    use a wider glob for matching ARM targets to make sure the test gets
>    run.
> 
>    ld/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> 
>    2014-10-30  Will Newton  <will.newton@linaro.org>
> 
>        * ld-unique/unique.exp: Use a wider glob for matching ARM
>        targets.
>        * ld-unique/unique.s: Use % instead of @ in .type directive.
>        * ld-unique/unique_shared.s: Likewise.
> 
> 
> commit 603c43995f4ee594b48ab52f1ea8d254b3a46f55
> Author: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@arm.com>
> Date:   Tue Nov 11 16:41:37 2014 +0000
> 
>    [PATCH] treate -specs as both cflags & ldflags
> 
>      ld/testsuite/
>        * lib/ld-lib.exp (run_ld_link_exec_tests): Append board_cflags if gcc driver
>        used as link tool.
>        (run_cc_link_exec_tests): Likewise.
> 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]