This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Diagnostics for missing libraries in DSOs


On Aug 22 2016, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:

> Currently, it is extremely easy to produce a DSO which links against
> compat symbols at run time: Just omit a required DSO when invoking the
> static linker.  As a result, the symbol reference in the created DSO will
> lack a version, and will be bound to a compat symbol at run time:
>
>   https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20489
>
> This is very difficult to diagnose properly.  It can also lead to current
> binaries reintroducing historic bugs which we did not want to push on
> applications for backwards compatibility reasons.
>
> What can we do here?  Can we provide a diagnostic at static link time?

ld --no-allow-shlib-undefined would turn them into errors.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE  1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]