This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [AArch64][SVE 12/32] Make more use of bfd_boolean


On 23/08/16 10:13, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Following on from the previous patch, which converted the
> aarch64_reg_parse_32_64 parameters to bfd_booleans, this one
> does the same for parse_address_main and parse_address.
> It also documents the parameters.
> 
> This isn't an attempt to convert the whole file to use bfd_booleans
> more often.  It's simply trying to avoid inconsistencies with new
> SVE parameters.
> 
> OK to install?
> 
> Thanks,
> Richard
> 
> 
> gas/
> 	* config/tc-aarch64.c (parse_address_main): Turn reloc and
> 	accept_reg_post_index into bfd_booleans.  Add commentary.
> 	(parse_address_reloc): Update accordingly.  Add commentary.
> 	(parse_address): Likewise.  Also change accept_reg_post_index
> 	into a bfd_boolean here.
> 	(parse_operands): Update calls accordingly.

My comment on the previous patch applies somewhat here too, although the
two bools are not as closely related here.  In particular statements
such as

  return parse_address_main (str, operand, TRUE, FALSE);

are not intuitively obvious to the reader of the code.

I accept that this patch is not really changing what the code previously
did for the worse, so I'll approve it on that basis.

OK.

R.

> 
> diff --git a/gas/config/tc-aarch64.c b/gas/config/tc-aarch64.c
> index 2e0e4f8..165ab9a 100644
> --- a/gas/config/tc-aarch64.c
> +++ b/gas/config/tc-aarch64.c
> @@ -3197,12 +3197,17 @@ parse_shifter_operand_reloc (char **str, aarch64_opnd_info *operand,
>  
>     The shift/extension information, if any, will be stored in .shifter.
>  
> -   It is the caller's responsibility to check for addressing modes not
> -   supported by the instruction, and to set inst.reloc.type.  */
> +   RELOC says whether relocation operators should be accepted
> +   and ACCEPT_REG_POST_INDEX says whether post-indexed register
> +   addressing should be accepted.
> +
> +   In all other cases, it is the caller's responsibility to check whether
> +   the addressing mode is supported by the instruction.  It is also the
> +   caller's responsibility to set inst.reloc.type.  */
>  
>  static bfd_boolean
> -parse_address_main (char **str, aarch64_opnd_info *operand, int reloc,
> -		    int accept_reg_post_index)
> +parse_address_main (char **str, aarch64_opnd_info *operand, bfd_boolean reloc,
> +		    bfd_boolean accept_reg_post_index)
>  {
>    char *p = *str;
>    int reg;
> @@ -3455,19 +3460,26 @@ parse_address_main (char **str, aarch64_opnd_info *operand, int reloc,
>    return TRUE;
>  }
>  
> -/* Return TRUE on success; otherwise return FALSE.  */
> +/* Parse an address that cannot contain relocation operators.
> +   Look for and parse "[Xn], (Xm|#m)" as post-indexed addressing
> +   if ACCEPT_REG_POST_INDEX is true.
> +
> +   Return TRUE on success.  */
>  static bfd_boolean
>  parse_address (char **str, aarch64_opnd_info *operand,
> -	       int accept_reg_post_index)
> +	       bfd_boolean accept_reg_post_index)
>  {
> -  return parse_address_main (str, operand, 0, accept_reg_post_index);
> +  return parse_address_main (str, operand, FALSE, accept_reg_post_index);
>  }
>  
> -/* Return TRUE on success; otherwise return FALSE.  */
> +/* Parse an address that can contain relocation operators.  Do not
> +   accept post-indexed addressing.
> +
> +   Return TRUE on success.  */
>  static bfd_boolean
>  parse_address_reloc (char **str, aarch64_opnd_info *operand)
>  {
> -  return parse_address_main (str, operand, 1, 0);
> +  return parse_address_main (str, operand, TRUE, FALSE);
>  }
>  
>  /* Parse an operand for a MOVZ, MOVN or MOVK instruction.
> @@ -5534,7 +5546,7 @@ parse_operands (char *str, const aarch64_opcode *opcode)
>  
>  	case AARCH64_OPND_ADDR_REGOFF:
>  	  /* [<Xn|SP>, <R><m>{, <extend> {<amount>}}]  */
> -	  po_misc_or_fail (parse_address (&str, info, 0));
> +	  po_misc_or_fail (parse_address (&str, info, FALSE));
>  	  if (info->addr.pcrel || !info->addr.offset.is_reg
>  	      || !info->addr.preind || info->addr.postind
>  	      || info->addr.writeback)
> @@ -5553,7 +5565,7 @@ parse_operands (char *str, const aarch64_opcode *opcode)
>  	  break;
>  
>  	case AARCH64_OPND_ADDR_SIMM7:
> -	  po_misc_or_fail (parse_address (&str, info, 0));
> +	  po_misc_or_fail (parse_address (&str, info, FALSE));
>  	  if (info->addr.pcrel || info->addr.offset.is_reg
>  	      || (!info->addr.preind && !info->addr.postind))
>  	    {
> @@ -5609,7 +5621,7 @@ parse_operands (char *str, const aarch64_opcode *opcode)
>  
>  	case AARCH64_OPND_SIMD_ADDR_POST:
>  	  /* [<Xn|SP>], <Xm|#<amount>>  */
> -	  po_misc_or_fail (parse_address (&str, info, 1));
> +	  po_misc_or_fail (parse_address (&str, info, TRUE));
>  	  if (!info->addr.postind || !info->addr.writeback)
>  	    {
>  	      set_syntax_error (_("invalid addressing mode"));
> 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]