This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [C++/78252] libiberty demangler crash with lambda (auto)


following discussion on the ABI list, here's an update to the generic lambda demangler patch.

The guts of the patch are the same as before -- note when we're printing a generic lambda's parms and interpret template type parm references differently. however:
1) don't refer to this as a mangling bug, because it isn't
2) add a ':$n' suffix to each generic parm, as that's how g++ itself shows them in diagnostics and the like.

I'll mark 78621 as not a bug too.

ok?

nathan

--
Nathan Sidwell
2016-12-12  Nathan Sidwell  <nathan@acm.org>

	libiberty/
	PR c++/78252
	* cp-demangle.c (struct d_print_info): Add is_lambda_arg field.
	(d_print_init): Initialize it.
	(d_print_comp_inner) <DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_TEMPLATE_PARAM>: Check
	is_lambda_arg for auto.
	<DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_REFERENCE,
	DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_RVALUE_REFERENCE>: Skip smashing check when
	is_lambda_arg.
	<DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_LAMBDA>: Increment is_lambda_arg around arg
	printing.
	* testsuite/demangle-expected: Add lambda auto mangling cases. 

	gcc/testsuite/
	PR c++/78252
	* g++.dg/cpp1y/lambda-mangle-1.C: New.

Index: libiberty/cp-demangle.c
===================================================================
--- libiberty/cp-demangle.c	(revision 243546)
+++ libiberty/cp-demangle.c	(working copy)
@@ -343,6 +343,9 @@ struct d_print_info
   struct d_print_mod *modifiers;
   /* Set to 1 if we saw a demangling error.  */
   int demangle_failure;
+  /* Non-zero if we're printing a lambda argument.  A template
+     parameter reference actually means 'auto'.  */
+  int is_lambda_arg;
   /* The current index into any template argument packs we are using
      for printing, or -1 to print the whole pack.  */
   int pack_index;
@@ -4126,6 +4129,7 @@ d_print_init (struct d_print_info *dpi,
   dpi->opaque = opaque;
 
   dpi->demangle_failure = 0;
+  dpi->is_lambda_arg = 0;
 
   dpi->component_stack = NULL;
 
@@ -4783,33 +4787,41 @@ d_print_comp_inner (struct d_print_info
       }
 
     case DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_TEMPLATE_PARAM:
-      {
-	struct d_print_template *hold_dpt;
-	struct demangle_component *a = d_lookup_template_argument (dpi, dc);
-
-	if (a && a->type == DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_TEMPLATE_ARGLIST)
-	  a = d_index_template_argument (a, dpi->pack_index);
+      if (dpi->is_lambda_arg)
+	{
+	  /* Show the template parm index, as that's how g++ displays
+	     these, and future proofs us against potential
+	     '[]<typename T> (T *a, T *b) {...}'.  */
+	  d_append_buffer (dpi, "auto:", 5);
+	  d_append_num (dpi, dc->u.s_number.number + 1);
+	}
+      else
+	{
+	  struct d_print_template *hold_dpt;
+	  struct demangle_component *a = d_lookup_template_argument (dpi, dc);
 
-	if (a == NULL)
-	  {
-	    d_print_error (dpi);
-	    return;
-	  }
+	  if (a && a->type == DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_TEMPLATE_ARGLIST)
+	    a = d_index_template_argument (a, dpi->pack_index);
 
-	/* While processing this parameter, we need to pop the list of
-	   templates.  This is because the template parameter may
-	   itself be a reference to a parameter of an outer
-	   template.  */
+	  if (a == NULL)
+	    {
+	      d_print_error (dpi);
+	      return;
+	    }
 
-	hold_dpt = dpi->templates;
-	dpi->templates = hold_dpt->next;
+	  /* While processing this parameter, we need to pop the list
+	     of templates.  This is because the template parameter may
+	     itself be a reference to a parameter of an outer
+	     template.  */
 
-	d_print_comp (dpi, options, a);
+	  hold_dpt = dpi->templates;
+	  dpi->templates = hold_dpt->next;
 
-	dpi->templates = hold_dpt;
+	  d_print_comp (dpi, options, a);
 
-	return;
-      }
+	  dpi->templates = hold_dpt;
+	}
+      return;
 
     case DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CTOR:
       d_print_comp (dpi, options, dc->u.s_ctor.name);
@@ -4946,7 +4958,8 @@ d_print_comp_inner (struct d_print_info
       {
 	/* Handle reference smashing: & + && = &.  */
 	const struct demangle_component *sub = d_left (dc);
-	if (sub->type == DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_TEMPLATE_PARAM)
+	if (!dpi->is_lambda_arg
+	    && sub->type == DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_TEMPLATE_PARAM)
 	  {
 	    struct d_saved_scope *scope = d_get_saved_scope (dpi, sub);
 	    struct demangle_component *a;
@@ -5616,7 +5629,11 @@ d_print_comp_inner (struct d_print_info
 
     case DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_LAMBDA:
       d_append_string (dpi, "{lambda(");
+      /* Generic lambda auto parms are mangled as the template type
+	 parm they are.  */
+      dpi->is_lambda_arg++;
       d_print_comp (dpi, options, dc->u.s_unary_num.sub);
+      dpi->is_lambda_arg--;
       d_append_string (dpi, ")#");
       d_append_num (dpi, dc->u.s_unary_num.num + 1);
       d_append_char (dpi, '}');
Index: libiberty/testsuite/demangle-expected
===================================================================
--- libiberty/testsuite/demangle-expected	(revision 243546)
+++ libiberty/testsuite/demangle-expected	(working copy)
@@ -4634,3 +4634,32 @@ _Z12binary_rightIJLi1ELi2ELi3EEEv1AIXfRp
 # ?: expression with missing third component could crash.
 AquT_quT_4mxautouT_4mxxx
 AquT_quT_4mxautouT_4mxxx
+
+# pr c++/78252 generic lambda mangling uses template parms, and leads
+# to unbounded recursion if not dealt with properly
+_Z7forwardIRZ3FoovEUlRT_E_EOS0_S1_
+Foo()::{lambda(auto:1&)#1}& forward<Foo()::{lambda(auto:1&)#1}&>(Foo()::{lambda(auto:1&)#1}&)
+
+_Z7forwardIZ3FoovEUlRiRT_E_EOS1_S2_
+Foo()::{lambda(int&, auto:1&)#1}&& forward<Foo()::{lambda(int&, auto:1&)#1}>(Foo()::{lambda(int&, auto:1&)#1}&)
+
+_Z7forwardIZ3FoovEUlRT_R1XIiEE0_EOS0_S1_
+Foo()::{lambda(auto:1&, X<int>&)#2}&& forward<Foo()::{lambda(auto:1&, X<int>&)#2}>(Foo()::{lambda(auto:1&, X<int>&)#2}&)
+
+_Z7forwardIZ3FoovEUlPA5_T_E1_EOS0_RS0_
+Foo()::{lambda(auto:1 (*&&forward<Foo()::{lambda(auto:1 (*) [5])#3}>(auto:1&)) [5])#3}
+
+_Z3eatIZ3FoovEUlRiRT_E_EvS2_
+void eat<Foo()::{lambda(int&, auto:1&)#1}>(Foo()::{lambda(int&, auto:1&)#1}&)
+
+_Z3eatIZ3FoovEUlRT_R1XIiEE0_EvS1_
+void eat<Foo()::{lambda(auto:1&, X<int>&)#2}>(Foo()::{lambda(auto:1&, X<int>&)#2}&)
+
+_Z3eatIZ3FoovEUlPA5_T_E1_EvRS0_
+void eat<Foo()::{lambda(auto:1 (*) [5])#3}>(Foo()::{lambda(auto:1 (*&) [5])#3})
+
+_Z3eatIPiZ3FoovEUlPT_PT0_E4_EvRS1_RS3_
+void eat<int*, Foo()::{lambda(auto:1*, auto:2*)#6}>(int*&, Foo()::{lambda(auto:1*, auto:2*)#6}&)
+
+_Z3eatIPiZ3BarIsEvvEUlPsPT_PT0_E0_EvRS3_RS5_
+void eat<int*, void Bar<short>()::{lambda(short*, auto:1*, auto:2*)#2}>(int*&, void Bar<short>()::{lambda(short*, auto:1*, auto:2*)#2}&)
Index: gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/lambda-mangle-1.C
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/lambda-mangle-1.C	(revision 0)
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/lambda-mangle-1.C	(working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+// { dg-do compile { target c++14 } }
+
+// PRs 78621
+
+// We erroneously mangled lambda auto parms as-if template parameters (T<n>_),
+// rather than auto (Da). Fixed in abi version 11
+
+template<typename T> class X;
+
+template<typename T>
+T &&forward (T &v)
+{
+  return static_cast<T &&> (v);
+}
+
+template<typename T>
+void eat (T &v)
+{
+}
+
+template<typename S, typename T>
+  void eat (S &, T &v)
+{
+}
+
+void Foo ()
+{
+  auto lam = [](auto &) { };
+  auto lam_1 = [](int &, auto &) { };
+  auto lam_2 = [](auto &, X<int> &) { };
+  auto lam_3 = [](auto (*)[5]) { };
+
+  forward (lam);
+  forward (lam_1);
+  forward (lam_2);
+  forward (lam_3);
+
+  eat (lam);
+  eat (lam_1);
+  eat (lam_2);
+  eat (lam_3);
+
+  // The auto lambda should mangle similarly to the non-auto one
+  auto lambda_1 = [](float *, float *) { };
+  auto lambda_2 = [](auto *, auto *) { };
+  auto lambda_3 = [](auto *, auto *) { };
+
+  int *i;
+  
+  eat (i, lambda_1);
+  eat (i, lambda_2);
+
+  // The autos should squangle to the first one.
+  eat (lambda_2, lambda_3);
+}
+
+template<typename X> void Bar ()
+{
+  auto lambda_1 = [](X *, float *, float *) { };
+  auto lambda_2 = [](X *, auto *, auto *) { };
+  auto lambda_3 = [](X *, auto *...) {};
+  
+  int *i;
+  
+  eat (i, lambda_1);
+  eat (i, lambda_2);
+  eat (i, lambda_3);
+}
+
+void Baz ()
+{
+  Bar<short> ();
+}
+
+// { dg-final { scan-assembler "_Z7forwardIZ3FoovEUlRT_E_EOS0_S1_:" } }
+// { dg-final { scan-assembler "_Z7forwardIZ3FoovEUlRiRT_E0_EOS1_S2_:" } }
+// { dg-final { scan-assembler "_Z7forwardIZ3FoovEUlRT_R1XIiEE1_EOS0_S1_:" } }
+// { dg-final { scan-assembler "_Z7forwardIZ3FoovEUlPA5_T_E2_EOS0_RS0_:" } }
+// { dg-final { scan-assembler "_Z3eatIZ3FoovEUlRT_E_EvS1_:" } }
+// { dg-final { scan-assembler "_Z3eatIZ3FoovEUlRiRT_E0_EvS2_:" } }
+// { dg-final { scan-assembler "_Z3eatIZ3FoovEUlRT_R1XIiEE1_EvS1_:" } }
+// { dg-final { scan-assembler "_Z3eatIZ3FoovEUlPA5_T_E2_EvRS0_:" } }
+// { dg-final { scan-assembler "_Z3eatIPiZ3FoovEUlPfS1_E3_EvRT_RT0_:" } }
+// { dg-final { scan-assembler "_Z3eatIPiZ3FoovEUlPT_PT0_E4_EvRS1_RS3_:" } }
+// { dg-final { scan-assembler "_Z3eatIZ3FoovEUlPT_PT0_E4_Z3FoovEUlS1_S3_E5_EvRS0_RS2_:" } }
+// { dg-final { scan-assembler "_Z3eatIPiZ3BarIsEvvEUlPsPfS3_E_EvRT_RT0_:" } }
+// { dg-final { scan-assembler "_Z3eatIPiZ3BarIsEvvEUlPsPT_PT0_E0_EvRS3_RS5_:" } }
+// { dg-final { scan-assembler "_Z3eatIPiZ3BarIsEvvEUlPsPT_zE1_EvRS3_RT0_:" } }

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]