This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Regen rx-decode.c
- From: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>
- To: Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com>, binutils at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 15:35:37 +0100
- Subject: Re: Regen rx-decode.c
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- Authentication-results: ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
- Authentication-results: ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nickc at redhat dot com
- Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 7491730AF41
- Dmarc-filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 7491730AF41
- References: <20170616143225.GN8406@bubble.grove.modra.org>
Hi Alan,
> opcodes/
> * rx-decode.c: Regenerate.
>
> Nick, your 2017-06-14 change said you'd regenerated this file, but I
> see line number changes like the following:
>
> @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ rx_decode_opcode (unsigned long pc AU,
> op[0]);
> }
> SYNTAX("brk");
> -#line 1025 "rx-decode.opc"
> +#line 1029 "rx-decode.opc"
> ID(brk);
>
> }
>
> Do we have a bug in opc2c?
Nope - it was my bad. I regenerated the file by hand, forgetting about the line numbers.
My commit from 2017-06-15 should have fixed this though as that did use op2c to regenerate the file.
Sorry for the snafu.
Cheers
Nick