This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
RE: I've broken my binutils version 2.28
On Fri, 15 Sep 2017, ANDY KENNEDY wrote:
> A specific question: In the file include/opcode/mips.h, I see lines
> like:
>
> #define INSN_OCTEON3 0x00000040
> #define INSN_XLR 0x00000020
>
>
> In the patch I stole from the web years ago, I found this:
>
> #define INSN_XLP 0x00000040
>
> 0x00000040 is now Octeon3's spot. What values are acceptable for this
> match?
Any unused bits except those claimed by INSN_ISA_MASK are free to take.
Make sure you have updated INSN_CHIP_MASK accordingly.
> I see where it XLR and OCTEON3 are used below in
> cpu_is_member(), but I also see there are no more unique values. I
> attempted to try 0x00000080 as a value, but that seems to be defined as:
>
> #define ASE_MT 0x00000080
>
> which I would expect would collide with that target.
Nope, INSN_* and ASE_* macros are used in different places these days.
> Am I allowed to use something like:
>
> #define INSN_XLP 0xdeadbee40
>
> to make it unique enough?
No, the data structure the chip INSN_* macros are used with is a bit
field, because a vendor-specific instruction can be implemented in more
than just one processor type.
Overall when adding support for a new CPU I advise looking through GIT
history for an earlier addition, to see what's needed to get it done
properly. See e.g. commit 2c62985659da ("MIPS: Add Octeon 3 support") for
a fairly straightforward recent update.
Maciej