This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Add a testcase for PR ld/22269


On 10/11/17, Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi H.J.
>
>> 	PR ld/22269
>> 	* testsuite/ld-elf/pr22269.d: New file.
>> 	* testsuite/ld-elf/pr22269.s:
>
> Approved - please apply.
>

This is what I checked in.  My follow up patches are on
users/hjl/pr22269 branch.

Thanks.

-- 
H.J.
From 4b97e3893ed2af7bdb9dcaa34fae1a207e2d7042 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2017 03:07:36 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Add 2 testcases for PR ld/22269

Since undefined weak symbols in static PIE are always resolved to 0 at
run-time, linker should resolve them as 0 at link-time, regardless of
whether "-z dynamic-undefined-weak" is used.  "-z dynamic-undefined-weak"
only makes undefined weak symbols dynamic, but doesn't change undefined
weak symbol resolution in static PIE at link-time.  These tests currently
pass on x86, but fails on many other targets.

The framework to resolve weak symbols in static PE at link-time is
posted at

https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2017-10/msg00087.html

which requires users/hjl/check_relocs branch to call check_relocs after
opening all inputs.  I will submit backend patches for failling targets
after merging users/hjl/check_relocs branch next.

	* PR ld/22269
	* testsuite/ld-elf/pr22269.s: New file.
	* testsuite/ld-elf/pr22269a.d: Likewise.
	* testsuite/ld-elf/pr22269b.d: Likewise.
---
 ld/ChangeLog                   |  7 +++++++
 ld/testsuite/ld-elf/pr22269.s  | 13 +++++++++++++
 ld/testsuite/ld-elf/pr22269a.d | 10 ++++++++++
 ld/testsuite/ld-elf/pr22269b.d | 10 ++++++++++
 4 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 ld/testsuite/ld-elf/pr22269.s
 create mode 100644 ld/testsuite/ld-elf/pr22269a.d
 create mode 100644 ld/testsuite/ld-elf/pr22269b.d

diff --git a/ld/ChangeLog b/ld/ChangeLog
index 17192529fe..43fa479b72 100644
--- a/ld/ChangeLog
+++ b/ld/ChangeLog
@@ -1,5 +1,12 @@
 2017-10-11  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
 
+	* PR ld/22269
+	* testsuite/ld-elf/pr22269.s: New file.
+	* testsuite/ld-elf/pr22269a.d: Likewise.
+	* testsuite/ld-elf/pr22269b.d: Likewise.
+
+2017-10-11  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
+
 	* testsuite/ld-i386/i386.exp: Run pr19636-1j, pr19636-1k,
 	pr19636-1l, pr19636-3h and pr19636-3i.
 	* testsuite/ld-i386/pr19636-1j.d: New file.
diff --git a/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/pr22269.s b/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/pr22269.s
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..71c1c06eea
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/pr22269.s
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+	.globl main
+	.globl start
+	.globl _start
+	.globl __start
+	.text
+main:
+start:
+_start:
+__start:
+	.byte 0
+	.section	.data.rel.ro.local,"aw",%progbits
+	.weak func
+	.dc.a func
diff --git a/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/pr22269a.d b/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/pr22269a.d
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..d993d19ba5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/pr22269a.d
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+#name: PR ld/22269
+#source: pr22269.s
+#ld: -pie --no-dynamic-linker
+#readelf: -r -x .data.rel.ro
+#target: *-*-linux* *-*-gnu* *-*-nacl*
+
+There are no relocations in this file.
+
+Hex dump of section '.data.rel.ro':
+  0x[a-f0-9]+ [0 ]+[ ]+.+
diff --git a/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/pr22269b.d b/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/pr22269b.d
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..8810922e7a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/pr22269b.d
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+#name: PR ld/22269 (-z dynamic-undefined-weak)
+#source: pr22269.s
+#ld: -pie --no-dynamic-linker -z dynamic-undefined-weak
+#readelf: -r -x .data.rel.ro
+#target: *-*-linux* *-*-gnu* *-*-nacl*
+
+There are no relocations in this file.
+
+Hex dump of section '.data.rel.ro':
+  0x[a-f0-9]+ [0 ]+[ ]+.+
-- 
2.13.6


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]