This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] x86-64: Treat PC32 relocation with branch as PLT32

From: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: Cary Coutant <ccoutant at gmail dot com>, Binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 17:38:10 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-64: Treat PC32 relocation with branch as PLT32
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <20180206133536.10841-1-hjl.tools@gmail.com> <ef5667a1-40a7-9f3f-27a7-4487aba3b8e1@redhat.com> <CAMe9rOrpCg9znDWfUocOe3ZFR=rcpqAxPjanTtq-LExtvZ9dhQ@mail.gmail.com> <0d55f017-f5e7-90da-2dc3-eab55f31edd4@redhat.com> <CAMe9rOr5nnNzx6YA_=EtmCZD=fGQ0j6sbYPTykzHNhwToPokiw@mail.gmail.com>

On 02/09/2018 04:21 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:

Looks normal to me:

https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2018-02/msg00085.html


Ah, lack of indentation and “To compiler Linux” confused me.

(I have not reviewed the patch.)

Thanks,
Florian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] x86-64: Treat PC32 relocation with branch as PLT32
  - From: H.J. Lu

References:
- [PATCH] x86-64: Treat PC32 relocation with branch as PLT32
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: [PATCH] x86-64: Treat PC32 relocation with branch as PLT32
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: [PATCH] x86-64: Treat PC32 relocation with branch as PLT32
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: [PATCH] x86-64: Treat PC32 relocation with branch as PLT32
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: [PATCH] x86-64: Treat PC32 relocation with branch as PLT32
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]