This is the mail archive of the cgen@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the CGEN project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Implementation Language

To: cgen at sources dot redhat dot com
Subject: Re: Implementation Language
From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche at redhat dot com>
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2000 17:52:33 -0400
References: <14729.40545.762999.300037@casey.transmeta.com> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0008040920200.3282-100000@moshpit.cygnus.com> <14732.19435.667853.528542@casey.transmeta.com>

Hi -

dje wrote:

>  > Can you expand?  I don't really consider the performance of code generation
>  > to be that critical -- look at G++ these days.
> 
> Also look at how long cgen takes to run vs the gen* fns in gcc. [...]

Right, though continuing to keep generated files cached
in CVS at least limits the pain to active developers
instead of everyone.

> btw, I'm playing with Rscheme a lot these days.  [...]

Looks nice, but them nonstandard extensions sure look addictive.

- FChE

PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Implementation Language
  - From: Ben Elliston
- Re: Implementation Language
  - From: Doug Evans

References:
- Re: Implementation Language
  - From: Doug Evans
- Re: Implementation Language
  - From: Ben Elliston
- Re: Implementation Language
  - From: Doug Evans

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]