Re: multi-insn expansions for macro insns?

[Doug Evans <dje at transmeta dot com>]

Greg McGary writes:
 > Doug Evans <dje@transmeta.com> writes:
 > 
 > > On the other hand, simple expansions are completely reasonable IMO.
 > > ...
 > >  >     (sequence () (emit ...) (emit ...))
 > > 
 > > That's the plan.  Note that the intent here is to also allow
 > > specification of runtime determination of what gets emitted.
 > > e.g. (sequence () (if (foo) (emit this) (emit that)))
 > 
 > Cool.  If no one else is actively working on this, I'll proceed.

No one is working on it that I know of.

Thanks!