This is the mail archive of the cgen@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the CGEN project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: cgen?


Miles Bader <miles@lsi.nec.co.jp> writes:

> I'm going to write GNU toolchain support (binutils/gas/gcc) for a
> new micro-controller processor arch, and I'd like to know if it's
> recommended these days to use "cgen" or not for the binutils/gas
> bits, as opposed to just rolling everything by hand.  [...]

This is not very relevant to gcc, in that cgen has no (public)
gcc-related porting backend.  It helps build assemblers and
simulators.  It is pretty stable and has a user base (including
various Red Hat porting contracts).

- FChE


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]