This is the mail archive of the
cgen@sourceware.org
mailing list for the CGEN project.
Re: insn semantics required?
- From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche at redhat dot com>
- To: Nathan Froyd <froydnj at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: cgen at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:53:14 -0500
- Subject: Re: insn semantics required?
- References: <20110124142354.GE6247@codesourcery.com>
Hi -
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 06:23:54AM -0800, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> I've been looking through the documentation and couldn't determine
> conclusively whether defining the semantics of an insn is required.
> [...]
> I suppose as a stopgap one could simply provide an uninteresting
> semantics for each insn.
Yes, you could pass (nop) or perhaps an empty list in the semantics
slot of the (dni ...).
- FChE