This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@cygnus.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 01:02:41AM +0100, Ola Liljedahl wrote: > > PowerPC has one exception for all interrupts (external > exception). The vectorization has to be done in SW if > at all (for a simple static design it might not be > needed). How meaningful would an interrupt keyword in > gcc be? How interrupt routines are called are not > specified by the PowerPC architecture but by a custom > SW architecture. The compiler could at least save all modified registers for interrupt routines, so that the assembler wrapper does not have to save unnecessary registers. cu Michael -- Michael Schwingen, Ahornstrasse 36, 52074 Aachen _______________________________________________ New CrossGCC FAQ: http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC _______________________________________________ To remove yourself from the crossgcc list, send mail to crossgcc-request@cygnus.com with the text 'unsubscribe' (without the quotes) in the body of the message.