This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Mark Palmerino wrote: > > I am taking Kai's gentle suggestions to consider using gcc-2.95.2 as the > base for building a cross-compiler with the target of m68k-coff. I am in > that process now. > > I have run into a problem that I'm hoping someone might suggest a solution > for. Here is the output during the make where it stops. It seems that there > is a "configure error" when checking whether the C compiler works. The funny > thing though is that I think it was working in the make before this point. Of course the compiler works, but the linking doesn't work... How else it could be ? > configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot > create executables. The compiler doesn't create executables, it only compiles the source into an assembly source... > checking whether the C compiler (/h/crossgcc/build-gcc295/gcc/xgcc > -B/h/crossgcc/build-gcc295/gcc/ -B/usr/local/m68k-coff/bin/ -g -O2 ) works... no > configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot > create executables. If you look at the '-B/usr/local/m68k-coff/bin/' in the command line, you will see that there must be something really wrong with the search paths for 'xgcc' !!! Otherwise this wouldn't be here. It helps the 'xgcc' to find the 'as' and 'ld' when building a compiler if they are in the '$prefix/$target/bin'. The '/usr/lib' and '/usr/include' will be found automatically for a native compiler. Nothing else for a cross-compile included... All the target stuff is accessed via the '$prefix/lib/gcc-lib/$target/2.95.x' with gcc-2.95.x, like the target headers: E:\usr\local\lib\gcc-lib\m68k-coff\2_95.3>cpp0 -v GNU CPP version 2.95.3 20010101 (prerelease) (68k, Motorola syntax) #include "..." search starts here: #include <...> search starts here: \usr\local\lib\gcc-lib\m68k-coff\2_95.3\..\..\..\..\include \usr\local\lib\gcc-lib\m68k-coff\2_95.3\include \usr\local\lib\gcc-lib\m68k-coff\2_95.3\..\..\..\..\m68k-coff\sys-include \usr\local\lib\gcc-lib\m68k-coff\2_95.3\..\..\..\..\m68k-coff\include End of search list. So the workaround for gcc-2.95.2 in your case is the pre-creation of the: /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/m68k-coff/2.95.2 Then and only then the target stuff will be found by the 'xgcc'... You must also fix the 'specs' just as you did with the gcc-2.8.1. Everything is the same as with it, the BCC as the target, using a linker script --- you can use the 'rm_rom.ld' now, and so on... I would suggest you to use the prebuilt libs and headers from the Objsw-package, or to install the GCC in this phase, leaving the libiberty and libstdc++ builds later, and building & installing newlib with your new GCC. It really is ready now, the extra libs are only missing. I prefer to install with my own install template, but 'make all-install-gcc' or something which installs only the stuff in the 'gcc' subdir, should work... Cheers, Kai PS. I will disappear to a skiing vacation for a week, but not taking no other 'plasm expanders' than just a little ethyl-alcohol, mixed into beer, I'll promise... Perhaps mixed into a little brandy too because of the under 20 Celsius temperature (meaning 'cognac', people here don't prefer 'brandy' at all, it is much cheaper and so on, if they don't see the bottle, they seldom taste the difference...) ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |