RE: Compile a new cross compiler

[David Korn <dkorn at pixelpower dot com>]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Hansjörg Petriffer [mailto:hpetriffer@grips.com]
>Sent: 21 March 2001 08:53

>Hello,
>
>>I work with cygwin 1.1.8.
>>  Are you using the --exec-prefix for any reason other than 
>because that's how old (beta) versions of cygwin are set up ?
>
>thank you for your answer. I think that there is no reason to use the
>--exec-prefix. I have found in a description of eCos for which 
>I make an cross compiler.

  Yes, ok, I think it's just a historical leftover; it would be simpler
to leave it out, and then everything will install itself in a nice 
standard tree.

>Have you any idea why I receive the following error message:
>
>/src/binutils/binutils-2.10.1/configure --target=i386-coff \
>--prefix=/tools --exec-prefix=/tools/H-i686-pc-cygwin \
>-v 2>&1 | tee configure.out 
>
>This runs without problem, but if I make then the binutils with
>
> make -w all install 2>&1 | tee make.out
>
>I receive the following error

>/bin/sh ./libtool --mode=link gcc  -g -O2 -W -Wall  -o libbfd.la -rpath
>--exec-p
>refix=/tools_i386_coff/H-i686-pc-cygwin/lib -release 2.10.1  archive.lo
>archures
>.lo bfd.lo cache.lo coffgen.lo corefile.lo format.lo init.lo libbfd.lo
>opncls.lo
> reloc.lo section.lo syms.lo targets.lo hash.lo linker.lo 
>srec.lo binary.lo
>tekh
>ex.lo ihex.lo stabs.lo stab-syms.lo `cat ofiles`
>libtool: link: only absolute run-paths are allowed
>make[3]: *** [libbfd.la] Error 1

  Sorry, I've never seen anything like that before.  It looks very much
as if there is a path missing after the -rpath option in this part of the
command line:

  -rpath --exec-prefix=/tools_i386_coff/H-i686-pc-cygwin/lib

and then the --exec-prefix option is being interpreted as a path for
the -rpath option, and since '--exec-prefix' doesn't begin with a '/',
it assumes it is a relative path, which, as it says, isn't allowed.
All this suggests there is some bug in the configure/makefile stuff.  It
might go away if you forget about the --exec-prefix, which I don't think
you really need anyway; but really you should enquire about this on
the binutils mailing list; and search the binutils list archive in case
it's a known bug.

      DaveK
-- 
 All your base are belong to us!


**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com