This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
In message <87bsmkltia.fsf@panther.aladdin.de>you write: > > On 07/16/2001 09:08:37 AM CST law wrote: > > > > In message <87elrhko7d.fsf@panther.aladdin.de>you write: > > > >I believe the correct approach is to ask Red Hat (assuming they were > the > > > >authors) to contribute their code to the public sources. Once that h > as > > > >been done then you can work on fixing/improving it. > > > > > > This was the reason of my license question 2 postings ago. But it's > > > maybe the best idea to ask Redhat themselves. > >Contributing the Z8000 backend to the public sources would not present > >any problem for Red Hat. I have in fact given the code to a few folks > >over the years who had expressed an interest in cleaning it up and > >contributing it. > > What's the newest version of the z8k gcc code. I found > ecosSWtools-990319-src.tar.bz2 which contains the z8k support. I > assume this one is the newest? Unknown. Cygnus/Red Hat hasn't done anything with the z8k code in several years. I don't recall when we actually removed it from our source repository though. jeff ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |