This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Rick: > I understand that the math operations helper library might be needed > on some platforms, to complete a fully useful installation of gcc. > But is that the only thing that is built with xgcc? What if I don't > care, in the case of embedded work which may never trigger gcc to > utilize the helper library. The main (only?) offender is gcc/libgcc2.c. Not only does it have the math helpers, it also has your atexit() and gccmain() (or __main()) implementations. > My cross build works fine up until the time it starts to do things > which invoke the xgcc which was built. Usually complaints about > missing header files. My current config is also complaining at the > point at which it trys to test that the local xgcc is working, > yielding a result of 'no', and then goes ahead to try to use it > anyway. Hmmm, I think that implies a header file installation problem. When you build your bootstrap, do you use the "all-gcc" target? b.g. -- Bill Gatliff I'm an embedded Linux developer first, Linux instructor second. http://billgatliff.com ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |