This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi, And probably new targets for h8300h and h8300s with -mint32 specified. I have seen such combinations in some other targets. Could be useful in making changes for the simulator. Regards, Venky > -----Original Message----- > From: Kazu Hirata [mailto:kazu@cs.umass.edu] > Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:55 AM > To: Andrew.Volkov@transas.com > Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org; crossgcc@sources.redhat.com; gnuh8@gnuh8.org.uk > Subject: Re: New targets to Binutils for H8 series > > > Hi Andrew, > > > Good idea, but I think also will be good, mark 26xx subtarget as > > new bfd-target too. > > I am basically for having a subtarget for each combination of > instruction set and mode. However, if we have .h2600 or something, > then we should probably have "upward compatibility" thing built into > the linker so that we can mix H8S/2600 code with H8S or H8/300H. This > way, we don't have to have separate libgcc.a and lib[mc].a, etc, for > H8S/2600 because the difference of instruction sets between H8S and > H8S/200 is only mac-related instructions. > > Kazu Hirata >
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |