This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
J. Johnston writes: > Dave, > > From the newlib/libgloss side, I have been thinking about this and I > propose that newlib adds a configuration option that tells newlib not to > supply low-level syscalls. This would allow you to build newlib without > the RDI/RDP syscalls. You should then place your new code > in the libgloss/arm directory and build a separate library, crt0, and ld > script which specifies both your library and your crt0. You can then > use the compiler -T option to specify your ld script. > > The configuration options solves a long-standing problem regarding older > platforms that put the syscall code in newlib and it really should be > in libgloss. We could copy the existing code over to libgloss and eventually > remove the problem by syncing up a default ld script with the compiler folks. Excellent idea. ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |