This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Relocating gcc after build (was: Include Directories)

From: Dan Kegel <dkegel at ixiacom dot com>
To: 'Jason Wilkins ' <fenix at io dot com>, "'crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com '" <crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com>
Cc: "'drow at mvista dot com'" <drow at mvista dot com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 20:27:38 -0800
Subject: Relocating gcc after build (was: Include Directories)

This is becoming a frequently asked question.

The RPMs from Montavista are relocatable.
Not sure what technique they used to do that
(well, ok, I did look at some of their patches when I was writing
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2002-07/msg00155.html
so I could probably figure it out if I had to).

Relocatability is sneaking into the main tree; see
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2003-02/msg00307.html
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2003-02/msg00428.html
No idea how much is left to do, or how long it'll take.
Daniel, care to comment?
- Dan

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Wilkins...
I want to be able to install [gcc-3.2.2] in any directory I want. 
The problem is that the compiler cannot find its include directories ...
How do I get the compiler to use relative paths?

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe at sources dot redhat dot com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Relocating gcc after build (was: Include Directories)
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]