This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Dan Kegel wrote: > > Ahh. I feel *much* better now. I actually gcc's "make check" > against a ppc750 system remotely. Life is wonderful! > > But now I have to interpret the results, and they're not all good. > > I'm testing gcc-3.3/glibc-2.3.2, and I forgot to use the -k option > to 'make check', so it terminated on the first failure. -k is a new one for me. When did it appear? Unfortunately, I don't have any magic recipe for dealing with test failures. It seems that you just need to look at them one at a time and figure out what went wrong, and then decide what to do about it. > What madman uses real-valued template parameters? The kind of madman who writes testsuites. There's one for C that takes a long long, casts it to a function pointer and calls through it. Or something like that. It seemed screwier than that sounds. - ken ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |