This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
--- Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com> wrote:
Generally, when bringing up a new version of gcc or glibc, I start out without any patches, and bring in just the ones I need as I run into the problems. So the pile of patches I end up with depends on which architectures I built and tested on...
A good methodology, IMHO. At the moment I'm sort of
trying to distill as simple as possible a recipe for
building a cross-compiler, thus my question about
whether the extra stuff was necessary.
Excellent - we have the same goal. Care to review my crosstool script and let me know if it's doing anything silly?
try to find a good source of prebuilt glibcs though too...
Good luck there. Depends on what platforms you need, I guess, and whether you trust other people's patching and testing habits. - Dan
-- Dan Kegel http://www.kegel.com http://counter.li.org/cgi-bin/runscript/display-person.cgi?user=78045
------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |