Re: self-contained cross-compiler?

[Roman Duka <rduka at mail dot ru>]

Dan Kegel wrote:
> Ken Wolcott wrote:
>
> >   I feel that I'll be told that I'm re-asking an already answered 
> > question, but I still have a linking problem with the cross compiler 
> > generated by crosstool.
> >
> >   When the cross tool chain we've generated by crosstool (version 24 
> > or 25) is expected to link, it references one or more libraries on the 
> > host system rather than the libraries generated by crosstool.
>
>
> Hi Ken!
>
> How do you know it's referencing libraries on the host system?
>
> Remember, if you're looking at shared libraries, the path
> embedded in the executable is only interpreted at runtime!
> - Dan
>
> ------
> Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, 
> http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
> Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com

he wants the actual cross compiler and cross binutils to be statically 
linked.
i had problems with statically linked executables, i.e. bash. running 
statically linked bash inside a chroot jail was fine, untill i attempted 
to install glibc inside the chroot jail, after the dynamic loader and 
libraries were installed, for some reason bash would segfault, i 
examined the core dump and it appeared that bash was trying to use 
dynamic libraries, even though it was a static executable????? does 
anybody know what was going on there???


------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com