This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi Dan; I'm not sure if this is exclusively an arm-specific kernel header missing issue or whether it is specific to at91. One of the developers was unable to build his arm (at91?) specific code without adding a directory of arm specific header files (obtained from a 2.95.3 arm environment) and changing the symlink: .../arm-arm9-linux-gnu/sys-include/asm/arch-at91 modified the link "arch" to point at "arch-at91" rather than "arch-integrator". Now the code compiles -- but where is the "pristine" source of this? would the rmk patch ftp://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/armlinux/source/kernel-patches/v2.4/patch-2.4.21-rmk1.bz2 have this code? I suspect not, as reading this email http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2004-January/019067.html So I feel like I am on the verge of success with having a fully-functional arm cross-compiler using crosstool (v0.25)... Next I need to build a minimal embedded environment (ptx again?)... Thanks, Ken On Thursday 15 January 2004 11:22, Daniel Kegel wrote: > Daniel Kegel wrote: > > Ken Wolcott wrote: > >> I've noticed a deficiency in my arm crosstool toolchains...no > >> arm-specific kernel header files > > I should ask - are any really needed, just to build the tools? > What problems do you run into without them? > - Dan ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |