This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Sun, 2004-04-04 at 14:14, Dan Kegel wrote: > Russ Dill wrote: > > Realize this is a bit late, but I use crosstool with the arm vfp patch > > and a printf fix. Works great. > > > > http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/pipermail/linux-arm/2003-October/006436.html > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/crossgcc/2004-02/msg00104.html > > > > I realize these issues are probably already solved, but I thought I'd > > add that just in case, since it is known working. > > What's *not* known is whether the printf fix breaks the non-vfp case. > Can you still successfully build and run a non-vfp arm system > with that patch in? dunno, but from the patch, it looks like it doesn't touch the other cases. > > Other notes for cross tool; It'd be nice to have an option to use a > > shared floating point library. It'd also be nice to have ada support, > > I'm currently having to build an x86 compiler of the same version, and > > use the gnat tools from there, and the gnatbind from my cross compiler. > > I'm going to add a simple way for the user to pass through > the languages list to the final gcc build, so you can e.g. > enable Java, but I don't have any immediate plans beyond that. good, helpfull start -- Russ Dill <Russ.Dill@asu.edu> ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |