This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Valid GCC/GLIB/binutils combinations

From: Dan Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>
To: Allen Curtis <acurtis at onz dot com>
Cc: crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 17:51:33 -0700
Subject: Re: Valid GCC/GLIB/binutils combinations
References: <F179AD88-A9F9-11D8-BB1C-000A95B312BA@onz.com>

Allen Curtis wrote:

Is this information posted someplace? I have routinely used newer binutils. Could this be a problem? (I haven't run into it yet but...)


I think it is, occasionally.
Best I have is a list of working combinations, kind of, in
gcc-*-glibc-*.dat in crosstool.  Also the chart at
http://www.embeddedtux.org/gnu-tools.html


--
My technical stuff: http://kegel.com
My politics: see http://www.misleader.org for examples of why I'm for regime change

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Valid GCC/GLIB/binutils combinations
  - From: Allen Curtis

References:
- Valid GCC/GLIB/binutils combinations
  - From: Allen Curtis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]