This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, Wouter van Heyst wrote: > On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 09:57:50AM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote: > Two people so far have mentioned they want big endian support, the rest > does not seem to care. At least one of them did not object to two > seperate toolchains, but taking your points below into account, it isn't > the best idea. I personally stopped working with big-endian ixdp425 and > just do little-endian nowadays. FWIW, I can provide big-endian (BE) patches for binutils 2.14 and gcc 3.2.3 which I believe should work, but which I could never test due to lack of HW. I'd gladly provide them to anyone interested and would like to get any feedback on them. The patches aim at getting a toolchain which _defaults_ to BE, rather than the standard one which merely is _capable_ of generating BE by throwing some commandline switches. Regards, Marius PS. Before someone reminds me: I _am_ aware of gcc 3.2.3's deficiencies on ARM, and I have already collected and applied the fixes neccessary. :-) -- Marius Groeger <mgroeger@sysgo.com> Project Manager SYSGO AG Embedded and Real-Time Software Voice: +49 6136 9948 0 FAX: +49 6136 9948 10 www.sysgo.com | www.elinos.com | www.osek.de | www.imerva.com ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |