Re: Core dump (Illegal instruction) with crosstool's GCJ

[Daniel Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>]

Martin Egholm Nielsen wrote:
> Now, I've tried using the root-filesystem from ELDK 3.0 which uses 
> glibc-2.3.1 and gcc-3.2.2, and with my crosstool-cygwin-3.4.0-2.3.2 I 
> _can_ now use static builds of _sample_ programs - not my faulty 
> application (of course) (but this is still something I couldn't do before).
> But I still cannot run a static application linked with 
> crosstool-3.4.0-2.2.5.
> That made me wonder: What are the requirements between compiler- and 
> glibc-versions for crosstool-compiled applications and the 
> target-system's system (both kernel and shell(?))?
> Do I need to compile an entire root-filesystem with the exact same 
> crosscompiler as my gcj-applications are compiled with?

It's sometimes required, but not always.

Try the chroot jail trick I mentioned in my previous note.

Also, if glibc-2.3.x works better for you than glibc-2.2.x,
perhaps you should take that as a message :-)
- Dan

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com