This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: floating point operations in gcc 3.3.3, glibc 2.3.2

From: Dan Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>
To: Daniel Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>
Cc: Kunjan Naik <KNaik at ixiacom dot com>, "'crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com'" <crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 21:34:32 -0700
Subject: Re: floating point operations in gcc 3.3.3, glibc 2.3.2
References: <15FDCE057B48784C80836803AE3598D506D0542C@racerx.ixiacom.com> <40D757EA.5070302@kegel.com>

Daniel Kegel wrote:

Kunjan Naik wrote:
I bet gcc-3.3.2-arm-softfloat.patch is the
culprit.
Indeed it is.


I don't understand :-(
I finally looked inside that patch, and it only affects gcc/config/arm, there's no
generic part.  How the heck could it cause ppc750 failures?

OK, now I'm curious.  I assume the testcase that was failing is
gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/struct-ret-1.c
I'm going to build gcc-3.3.3 with and without that patch,
and look at the output of 'powerpc-750-linux-gnu-gcc -S struct-ret-1.c'
to see if it changes.
- Dan

--
My technical stuff: http://kegel.com
My politics: see http://www.misleader.org for examples of why I'm for regime change

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: floating point operations in gcc 3.3.3, glibc 2.3.2
  - From: Dan Kegel

References:
- RE: floating point operations in gcc 3.3.3, glibc 2.3.2
  - From: Kunjan Naik
- Re: floating point operations in gcc 3.3.3, glibc 2.3.2
  - From: Daniel Kegel

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]