This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Daniel Kegel wrote:
Kunjan Naik wrote:
I bet gcc-3.3.2-arm-softfloat.patch is the culprit.
Indeed it is.
I don't understand :-(
I finally looked inside that patch, and it only affects gcc/config/arm, there's no
generic part. How the heck could it cause ppc750 failures?
OK, now I'm curious. I assume the testcase that was failing is gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/struct-ret-1.c I'm going to build gcc-3.3.3 with and without that patch, and look at the output of 'powerpc-750-linux-gnu-gcc -S struct-ret-1.c' to see if it changes.
Can you check whether the .s files produced by 'powerpc-750-linux-gnu-gcc -save-temps struct-ret-1.c' differ between the good and bad toolchains? And if so, send me both? - Dan
-- My technical stuff: http://kegel.com My politics: see http://www.misleader.org for examples of why I'm for regime change
------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |