This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 16:11, Dan Kegel wrote: > Jean-Christophe Dubois wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I manage to generate the cross tool chain for GCC 3.4.0/GLIBC > > 2.3.2/Binutils 2.14 on my Solaris 8 systems. All seems to be well. > > > > But I then tried to cross-compile the linux kernel and ran into some > > problem. You can find the verbose trace bellow. It looks like there is a > > problem in the way gcc calls as. In my case as is called with "-mppc > > -maltivec -many". While the 2 first one seems OK, the last one "-many" > > prevent as from decoding correctly the "mftbX" operation that are > > generated under #APPS #NO_HAPPS in the assembly file. > > BTW, have you tried binutils-2.15 with this patch yet? > http://kegel.com/crosstool/crosstool-0.28-rc25/patches/binutils-2.15/binutils-2.15-vmx.patch Well, for some reason (not yet identified), the cross binutils I generate with 2.15 crash on me (host Solaris 2.8, target ppc 7400). So I downgraded to 2.14 which works OK for me (so it seems). JC > - Dan ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |