This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
I'm quite sure I tried all combinations
What I found out later:
glibc-build is 488M after compiling with gcc-3.3.3 but only 198M
after compiling with gcc-3.4.1. The difference is distributed
evenly among the subdirectories. This convinces me that the problem is in glibc.
How about testing chimeric glibc's, i.e. ones compiled half with gcc-3.3.3, half with gcc-3.4.1? You could do that by hitting ^C partway through the build and changing the PATH, I imagine. (Or by selectively removing .o's and rerunning the build.) This ought to let you zero in on what part of glibc is being miscompiled... - Dan
------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |