This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 15:35, Daniel Kegel wrote: \\ > Please try crosstool-0.28-rc30. It has arm fixes. > > > KERNELCONFIG=$PWD/arm.config > > TARGET=arm-elf-linux > > TARGET_CFLAGS="-march=armv4 -O" > > GCC_EXTRA_CONFIG="--with-float=hard" > > I had problems in the distant past with gcc defaults in GCC_EXTRA_CONFIG > not applying for the glibc or stdlibc++ built by crosstool, so it might > be worth > also setting > TARGET_CFLAGS="-march=armv4 -O -mhard-float" > in that file. > Dan, I found another one of your postings in which you suggested to someone else who was having this same fp problem that they use the beta 2.14.90* version of binutils instead of binutils-2.14. This seems to have cleared up the glibc build problem. I don't know just how much is working yet, but I do appear to have made progress with this approach. I will keep you posted! craig > Have you looked in glibc cvs to see if the missing instructions are > used? > Why are the instructions missing? > Do we need to configure binutils differently? > - Dan ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |