This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Em Thursday 29 July 2004 20:39, you wrote:
Rafael Ávila de Espíndola wrote: Thanks. Are the extra patches inside your attached patch good enough to contribute back to gcc mainline? e.g. would it be sensible to do mv debian/patches/glibc-2.3.2-csu-make.patch patches/glibc-2.3.2/glibc-2.3.2-csu-make.patch ?
Yes. In fact I have already emailed it: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/crossgcc/2004-07/msg00035.html
I guess I'll test with dash, then. Is this the right URL? http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/dash/ Also, have you verified that patch works with other shells?
All the others are already in crosstool: glibc-2.3.2-allow-gcc-3.4-inline.patch glibc-2.3.2-without-fp.patch glibc-2.3.2-powerpc-procfs.patch sscanf.patch Why the duplication? Oh, your procedure doesn't use *any* of the patches in the crosstool patch repository, so you had to copy the ones you felt you needed, I guess. - Dan
-- My technical stuff: http://kegel.com My politics: see http://www.misleader.org for examples of why I'm for regime change
------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |