This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: gcc-3.3 VS gcc-2.95.3 soft floating point on mipsel?

David Wuertele wrote: 
Dan> There is a softfloat patch floating (heh) around for gcc-3.3.3,
Dan> but you'd probably be better off using gcc-3.4.1, which has the
Dan> patch already applied.  Can you try 3.4.1?

I've just kicked off a make using 3.4.1.  Is glibc-2.3.2 still the
glibc of choice to use with gcc-3.4.1?


Yes, though if you run into any problems, there are lots of
fixes sitting in glibc cvs (e.g. glibc-2.3.3, which hasn't
really been released, but was tagged in December).

I have had problems with binutils-2.15, but 2.14 seems to work okay
for me.  Is there a compelling reason to try a later binutils?


Not that I recall.  My strategy is 'use it until it breaks, then upgrade'.
- Dan

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]