This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hello crosstool gurus; I generated an arm cross compiler to my development team using crosstool about none months ago. Now the developers would like to make a modification to include/c++/3.2.1/arm-arm9-linux-gnu/bits/c++config.h so that they can dynamically fiddle with how malloc gets implemented. I looked in the tarball sources I used at the time for such a file. It does not exist in the linux headers, glibc, glibc_linuxthreads or binutils. So it must dynamically get created when crosstool genrates the compiler. So I downloaded the most current crosstool, applied my demo file I used nine months ago to generate the production cross compiler and I noticed in the output "..../arm-arm9-linux-gnu/bits/c++config.h...", so I know for sure that it is dynamically created. My question is: if the developers change this dynamically generated file then the object(s) and/or library produced will have the desired macro they defined? Is there a library that I need to change? If I compile something with this cross compiler, will the macro they defined show up in the resultant object without altering any libraries? Thanks in advance for trying to understand what I wrote and make sense of the question :-) Ken Wolcott ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |