This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Is gcc 2.95 or 3 faster for M68K app?

From: Dan Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>
To: Dan Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>
Cc: Toralf Lund <toralf at procaptura dot com>, crossgcc <crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 04:47:46 -0700
Subject: Re: Is gcc 2.95 or 3 faster for M68K app?
References: <4178DA14.7080306@procaptura.com> <4178F26E.3050405@kegel.com>

Dan Kegel wrote:

The reason why I'm asking instead of just trying is that I wasn't able to build gcc 3.4.2 directly. Got a strage recursion in the configure calls...
Did you try using http://kegel.com/crosstool to build a cross-compiler?
That seems to work...


Oh, sorry, you're using newlib.  I don't handle that yet.
- Dan

--
Trying to get a job as a c++ developer?  See http://kegel.com/academy/getting-hired.html

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is gcc 2.95 or 3 faster for M68K app?
  - From: Peter Barada

References:
- Is gcc 2.95 or 3 faster for M68K app?
  - From: Toralf Lund
- Re: Is gcc 2.95 or 3 faster for M68K app?
  - From: Dan Kegel

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]