This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Is gcc 2.95 or 3 faster for M68K app?

From: Dan Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>
To: Toralf Lund <toralf at procaptura dot com>
Cc: crossgcc <crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 05:57:40 -0700
Subject: Re: Is gcc 2.95 or 3 faster for M68K app?
References: <4178DA14.7080306@procaptura.com> <4178F26E.3050405@kegel.com> <4179033D.1020506@procaptura.com>

Toralf Lund wrote:

Did you try using http://kegel.com/crosstool to build a cross-compiler?
That seems to work...
Oh, sorry, you're using newlib. I don't handle that yet.
OK. I also want to generate rpms (do you support that?), so I've written my own a spec file, but it has borrowed a lot from Bill Gatliff's build-crossgcc.sh


Yep, I do have a script that builds RPMs; it's included with crosstool.
It's kind of a bastardization, though, as it doesn't currently have
a real spec file.
- Dan


--
Trying to get a job as a c++ developer?  See http://kegel.com/academy/getting-hired.html

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com

References:
- Is gcc 2.95 or 3 faster for M68K app?
  - From: Toralf Lund
- Re: Is gcc 2.95 or 3 faster for M68K app?
  - From: Dan Kegel
- Re: Is gcc 2.95 or 3 faster for M68K app?
  - From: Toralf Lund

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]