This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
I've been using crosstool-generated gcc-3.3.3 to build my mipsel targets, and I find that the file sizes are humungous. After stripping the objects, I get file sizes that are up to TWICE as large as similarly generated gcc-2.96 code. Do these sizes not look out of line? bytes gcc-3.3.3 generated files ------- -------------------------------- 1884160 /lib/libc-2.3.2.so 1257472 /lib/libstdc++.so.5.0.5 1048576 /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.1314.0.0.10 1036288 /bin/busybox 1011712 /bin/bash bytes gcc-2.96 generated files ------- -------------------------------- 1531904 /lib/libc-2.2.4.so 532480 /lib/libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so 495616 /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.1314.0.0.10 462848 /bin/busybox 847872 /bin/bash Compiling with -Os helps, but doesn't get close to the file sizes I saw with my older cross-compiler. It seems strange to me that moving to a newer compiler will reduce the number of programs I can ship in my little NAND flash. Is there some way to generate a more efficient cross-compiler? Thanks, Dave ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |