This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

compiler for arm-9tdmi using gcc-3.3.5

From: Carlos de <carlos_desa at yahoo dot com>
To: crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 12:22:47 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: compiler for arm-9tdmi using gcc-3.3.5
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=W5ADfSTtejeKuS+rGZFqWWlZkF4xEi5t7H4wkhIjqK4UauKw74hVnbQ0/lQGN5hYmLTdQubdj23TcSoZnFKHBiEr4aUYd5xTJiIbHN5NDzLwoQKT1VtnQUZpSKNbTZqOZ0gOQ7xLvus+DYiDPf+v/E+mByKdV9sd9agwfp4/1mM= ;

Hi 
Would just like to know if anyone has faced any
problems with cross-compiling for the samsung s3c2410
(arm-9tdmi or should it be arm-920t?) using gcc3.3.5. 


Have used crosstool-0.28-rc36 ,binutils-2.15 and
glibc-2.3.2 against the 2.6.8.1 linux headers
(smdk2410d_defconfig). I havent faced any problems as
yet but then again I havent got the board to test on !

I'm particularly concerned about using gcc-3.3.5. I
have yet to see any sucessful builds using gcc-3.3.5
though i've not found any reports of problems either. 
Has anyone faced any problems using gcc-3.3.5 ? I
would presume that the latest release would be better
than the previous. 

Thanks
Carlos



	
	
		
___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]